ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Прагматичный дизайн смешанных методов×Многофазный смешанный дизайн методов×
ОбластьДизайн исследованияДизайн исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появленияEarly 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research)
Автор методаJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard RortyJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
ТипMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Основополагающий источникCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute
Другие названияpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methodsmultiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods
Связанные66
СводкаPragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design · Multiphase Mixed Methods Design. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare