ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Прагматический лабораторный эксперимент×Полевой эксперимент×
ОбластьПланирование экспериментаПланирование эксперимента
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1967 (foundational distinction); 2009 (PRECIS operationalization)1920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
Автор методаSchwartz & Lellouch (pragmatic–explanatory distinction); extended by PRECIS framework developersFormalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
ТипExperimental design philosophy and study typeExperimental design
Основополагающий источникSchwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20(8), 637–648. DOI ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
Другие названияpragmatic experiment, applied laboratory trial, practice-oriented lab experiment, pragmatic controlled experimentfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
Связанные35
СводкаA pragmatic laboratory experiment is a controlled study conducted in a laboratory setting that prioritises external validity and real-world applicability over the stringent internal controls characteristic of purely explanatory experiments. Drawing on the pragmatic–explanatory continuum formalised by Schwartz and Lellouch (1967) and later operationalised in the PRECIS framework, it asks whether an intervention works under conditions that approximate actual practice rather than ideal circumstances, making findings directly actionable for decision-makers and practitioners.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Pragmatic Laboratory Experiment · Field Experiment. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare