ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Сопоставление по показателю склонности для оценки политики×Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводСтатистика исследований
СемействоRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Год появления1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19971983
Автор методаRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипQuasi-experimental matching estimatorMethod
Основополагающий источникRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Другие названияPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Связанные63
СводкаPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Matching. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare