Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Тест на плацебо в образовательных исследованиях× | Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Причинно-следственный вывод | Статистика исследований |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | Widely adopted in applied econometrics and education research; codified by Imbens, Wooldridge, Lee, and Lemieux | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Falsification / robustness check | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5-86. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | placebo regression, falsification test, placebo check, fake-treatment test | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | A placebo test is a falsification check used in quasi-experimental education research to validate a causal design. By applying the same estimator to a time period, group, or outcome where no real effect should exist, researchers verify that their identification strategy is not picking up spurious patterns. A statistically significant placebo estimate signals a flaw in the design, while a null result supports its credibility. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|