Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ главных компонент× | SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Машинное обучение | Машинное обучение |
| Семейство | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Год появления≠ | 2002 | 2017 |
| Автор метода≠ | Jolliffe, I.T. (textbook); Pearson & Hotelling (origins) | Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I. |
| Тип≠ | Unsupervised dimensionality reduction | Model-explanation method (Shapley-value attribution) |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Jolliffe, I.T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. DOI ↗ | Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4766–4777. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | Temel Bileşenler Analizi (PCA), PCA, principal components analysis, Karhunen-Loève transform | SHAP Değerleri (Model Açıklanabilirlik), Shapley additive explanations, SHAP values, model explainability |
| Связанные≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is an unsupervised dimensionality-reduction method — given its modern textbook treatment by Ian Jolliffe (2002) — that compresses high-dimensional data into fewer dimensions while preserving the maximum possible variance. It re-expresses correlated variables as a small set of uncorrelated principal components ordered by how much of the data's variation each one captures. | SHAP is a model-explanation method, introduced by Scott Lundberg and Su-In Lee in 2017, that uses Shapley values from cooperative game theory to measure how much each feature contributes to an individual prediction, making the output of black-box machine-learning models interpretable. It supports both global explanations (overall feature importance) and local explanations (why one specific prediction came out the way it did). |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|