Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Партисипативный качественный контент-анализ× | Рефлексивный тематический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| Автор метода≠ | Emerged from integration of participatory action research (Lewin, 1946; Reason & Bradbury, 2001) with qualitative content analysis (Mayring, 2000; Schreier, 2012) | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Тип≠ | Participatory qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1849205931 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | PQCA, participatory QCA, community-based qualitative content analysis, collaborative qualitative content analysis | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 2 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Participatory Qualitative Content Analysis (PQCA) integrates the systematic text-analytic procedures of qualitative content analysis with the collaborative, power-sharing ethos of participatory research. Community members or stakeholders join the research team as co-analysts — helping to define the coding frame, interpret categories, and validate findings — rather than serving merely as data sources. The result is analysis that is both methodologically rigorous and grounded in the perspectives of those most affected by the research topic. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|