Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Взвешивание на основе показателя склонности для панельных данных× | Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Причинно-следственный вывод | Статистика исследований |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000-2003 | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | Hirano, Imbens & Ridder; Robins, Hernan & Brumback | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Causal inference / panel weighting | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | panel PSW, panel IPW, longitudinal propensity score weighting, panel inverse probability weighting | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Panel Data Propensity Score Weighting (panel PSW) extends inverse probability weighting to longitudinal settings where the same units are observed across multiple time periods. It reweights observations by the inverse of each unit's time-varying probability of receiving treatment, creating a pseudo-population in which treatment is balanced on observed covariates at each period, and then estimates causal effects from repeated-measures data. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|