ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Тестирование инвариантности порядковых измерений×Порядковый конфирматорный факторный анализ×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления1984–20111984
Автор методаRoger Millsap; Bengt MuthénBengt O. Muthén
ТипMulti-group model comparisonLatent variable / structural
Основополагающий источникMillsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗
Другие названияordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invarianceCFA for ordinal data, polychoric CFA, WLSMV CFA, categorical CFA
Связанные65
СводкаOrdinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous.Ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (Ordinal CFA) tests a pre-specified factor structure when the observed indicators are ordinal — typically Likert-type survey items. By using polychoric correlations and robust estimators such as WLSMV, it avoids the bias that arises from treating categorical responses as continuous.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Ordinal Measurement Invariance · Ordinal CFA. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare