Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Оценка ординальной содержательной валидности× | Разработка шкалы× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 2003 | 1991–1995 |
| Автор метода≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Тип≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Другие названия | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|