Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Онлайн-теоретическая выборка× | Снежный ком× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Методология опросов | Методология опросов |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1967 (theoretical sampling); online adaptation ~2000s–2010s | 1961 |
| Автор метода≠ | Glaser & Strauss (theoretical sampling); adapted to online contexts by internet qualitative researchers | Leo A. Goodman |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling technique |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | internet-based theoretical sampling, digital theoretical sampling, web-based theoretical sampling | chain-referral sampling, network sampling, respondent-driven sampling, referral sampling |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Online theoretical sampling applies the logic of theoretical sampling — selecting participants or data sources based on emerging theory rather than predetermined criteria — within digital environments. Researchers iteratively recruit from online communities, forums, social media, or virtual networks, guided at each step by conceptual gaps identified during concurrent analysis. It is most commonly used in grounded theory studies conducted wholly or partially over the internet. | Snowball sampling is a non-probability recruitment technique in which initial participants (seeds) refer the researcher to others who meet the study criteria, and those referrals in turn refer further participants. The sample grows incrementally — like a rolling snowball — until the required size or theoretical saturation is reached. It is the method of choice when a target population has no accessible sampling frame, such as undocumented migrants, illicit drug users, survivors of stigmatised experiences, or members of closed professional networks. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|