ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

NOMINATE×Wordfish Scaling×
ОбластьPolitical SciencePolitical Science
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления19852008
Автор методаKeith T. Poole and Howard RosenthalJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver Proksch
ТипSpatial scaling model of roll-call votingUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count data
Основополагающий источникPoole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1985). A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384. DOI ↗Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗
Другие названияDW-NOMINATE, W-NOMINATE, Nominal Three-Step Estimation, Poole-Rosenthal scoresWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimation
Связанные34
СводкаNOMINATE — Nominal Three-step Estimation — is the family of spatial scaling procedures developed by Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal to recover legislators' ideological positions from roll-call votes. Each legislator and the yea and nay outcomes of each vote are placed in a low-dimensional space, and a normal (Gaussian) deterministic utility plus a random shock governs choices. Fitted by maximum likelihood, NOMINATE produces the canonical ideal-point coordinates used to chart polarization across two centuries of the U.S. Congress, with the dynamic DW-NOMINATE variant allowing positions to drift smoothly over time.Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: NOMINATE · Wordfish Scaling. Получено 2026-06-24 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare