ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Функциональная классификация Нью-Йоркской кардиологической ассоциации (NYHA)×Миннесотский опросник качества жизни при сердечной недостаточности (MLHFQ)×
ОбластьКардиологияКардиология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19941987
Автор методаNew York Heart AssociationTimothy S. Rector
ТипOrdinal clinician-assessment classification systemSelf-report questionnaire
Основополагающий источникThe Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. (1994). Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels (9th ed.). Little, Brown and Company. link ↗Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: Content, reliability and responsiveness of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3(5), 198–209. link ↗
Другие названияNYHA, NYHA Class, Functional ClassificationMLHFQ
Связанные44
СводкаThe New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification is a four-category ordinal system for grading heart failure severity based on the level of physical activity that precipitates dyspnea or other HF symptoms. Established by the NYHA in 1928 and refined in 1994, the NYHA classification is the oldest and most widely used functional status metric in cardiology, providing a simple, clinically intuitive framework for describing HF symptom burden, guiding treatment intensity, and predicting prognosis.The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a 21-item self-report measure that quantifies the multidimensional burden of heart failure on patients' daily living and quality of life. Developed by Rector, Kubo, and Cohn in 1987, the MLHFQ is the most widely used disease-specific QoL instrument in heart failure research and clinical practice, valued for its brevity, sensitivity to treatment response, and predictive value for prognosis.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: New York Heart Association Functional Classification · Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare