ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Функциональная классификация Нью-Йоркской кардиологической ассоциации (NYHA)×Канзасский опросник по кардиомиопатии (KCCQ)×
ОбластьКардиологияКардиология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19942000
Автор методаNew York Heart AssociationJohn A. Spertus
ТипOrdinal clinician-assessment classification systemSelf-report questionnaire
Основополагающий источникThe Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. (1994). Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels (9th ed.). Little, Brown and Company. link ↗Green, C. P., Porter, C. B., Bresnahan, D. R., & Spertus, J. A. (2000). Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health-related quality of life measure for heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(5), 1245–1253. DOI ↗
Другие названияNYHA, NYHA Class, Functional ClassificationKCCQ
Связанные44
СводкаThe New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification is a four-category ordinal system for grading heart failure severity based on the level of physical activity that precipitates dyspnea or other HF symptoms. Established by the NYHA in 1928 and refined in 1994, the NYHA classification is the oldest and most widely used functional status metric in cardiology, providing a simple, clinically intuitive framework for describing HF symptom burden, guiding treatment intensity, and predicting prognosis.The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, multidimensional self-report measure that evaluates heart failure-related symptoms, functional limitations, and quality of life in patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure of all severities. Developed by Spertus and colleagues in 2000, the KCCQ provides six disease-specific domains and a clinically summary score, making it ideal for comprehensive, domain-focused assessment in both clinical practice and research.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: New York Heart Association Functional Classification · Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare