Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Net-Map (Influence Network Mapping)× | Participatory Rural Appraisal× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2010 | 1994 |
| Автор метода≠ | Eva Schiffer (with Jennifer Hauck) | Robert Chambers and collaborators |
| Тип≠ | Participatory tool for collecting social/influence network data and facilitating learning | Family of participatory field appraisal and planning methods |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. DOI ↗ | Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | Net-Map, Influence Network Mapping, Participatory Influence Mapping, Influence Tower Mapping | PRA, Participatory Learning and Action, Participatory Rural Appraisal Methods, PLA |
| Связанные≠ | 3 | 2 |
| Сводка≠ | Net-Map is a participatory, paper-based tool developed by Eva Schiffer for collecting social and influence network data while helping participants reflect on the networks they are part of. Sitting around a large sheet, participants name the actors involved in a goal or process, draw and label the links between them by type (for example funding, information, or command), and then stack physical 'influence towers' — disks or blocks — beside each actor to show how much power that actor holds. The session produces both a rich qualitative discussion and a quantitative, analyzable network with weighted nodes and typed, directed ties. | Participatory rural appraisal is a growing family of approaches and methods that enable local people to share, enhance, and analyze their own knowledge of their lives and conditions, and to plan and act on it. Associated above all with Robert Chambers, PRA reverses the conventional research relationship: outside facilitators hand over the stick, and community members themselves do the mapping, ranking, diagramming, and analysis that drive planning and action. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|