ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Negative Control Outcome Design×Self-Controlled Case Series×
ОбластьSocial EpidemiologySocial Epidemiology
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления20101995
Автор методаMarc Lipsitch, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen & Ted Cohen; Xu Shi & Wang MiaoC. Paddy Farrington
ТипFalsification-and-correction pipeline for unmeasured confoundingWithin-person case-only design for transient exposures and acute outcomes
Основополагающий источникLipsitch, M., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E., & Cohen, T. (2010). Negative Controls: A Tool for Detecting Confounding and Bias in Observational Studies. Epidemiology, 21(3), 383-388. DOI ↗Farrington, C. P. (1995). Relative Incidence Estimation from Case Series for Vaccine Safety Evaluation. Biometrics, 51(1), 228-235. DOI ↗
Другие названияNegative Controls, Negative Control Outcome, Negative Control Exposure, Falsification Endpoint AnalysisSCCS, Case Series Method, Within-Person Comparison Design, Farrington Method
Связанные43
СводкаThe negative control design uses a deliberately chosen outcome (or exposure) that cannot plausibly be caused by the exposure under study, yet is subject to the same unmeasured confounding, selection, or measurement processes as the real research question. If the exposure appears to 'affect' something it cannot possibly affect, that spurious association is a signature of residual bias. Lipsitch, Tchetgen Tchetgen, and Cohen formalized this falsification logic for epidemiology in 2010, specifying the conditions a valid negative control must satisfy. Shi, Miao, and Tchetgen Tchetgen's 2020 review extended the idea from detection toward correction, showing how pairs of negative control variables underpin proximal causal inference, which can recover an unbiased effect estimate even when the confounder is never measured.The self-controlled case series, or SCCS, is a case-only study design for estimating the association between a transient exposure and an acute event by comparing each individual's event rate during exposed time windows with their rate during unexposed time windows. Developed by Paddy Farrington in 1995 for vaccine safety evaluation, it uses data only on people who experienced the outcome, and because each person serves as their own control, it automatically eliminates all fixed within-person confounders — genetics, sex, chronic conditions, socioeconomic position — without ever measuring them. A conditional Poisson likelihood removes the individual-level baseline rate and yields a relative incidence comparing risk to control periods. Whitaker, Farrington, Spiessens and Musonda's 2006 Statistics in Medicine tutorial is the standard practical guide to fitting and interpreting the model.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Negative Control Outcome Design · Self-Controlled Case Series. Получено 2026-06-24 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare