Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Нарративный анализ× | Дискурс-анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Качественные методы | Качественные исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор метода≠ | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative interpretive method | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Сводка≠ | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|