Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Нейтрософское расширение GRA× | Аналитический иерархический процесс× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Принятие решений | Принятие решений |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 2014 | 1980 |
| Автор метода≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Тип≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. (2014). Entropy based grey relational analysis method for multi-attribute decision-making under single valued neutrosophic assessments. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Другие названия | — | — |
| Связанные | 8 | 8 |
| Сводка≠ | N-GRA (Neutrosophic extension of GRA) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. in 2014. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|