Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Инструмент оценки музыкотерапии× | Шкала отношения к комплементарной и альтернативной медицине× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Интегративная медицина | Интегративная медицина |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2008 | 2003 |
| Автор метода≠ | Hanson, B.; Clark, M.; Plante, W. | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. |
| Тип≠ | Multi-method: client self-report, clinician observation, behavioral coding | Self-report scale |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York: Routledge. link ↗ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | MTAT, Music Therapy Outcome Measures | ACAMS |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The MTAT is a comprehensive assessment instrument for measuring client outcomes and music therapist competency in music therapy. Developed by Hanson and colleagues, it operationalizes music therapy impact across emotional, social, behavioral, and physiological domains, suitable for diverse populations including psychiatric, pediatric, geriatric, and neurological populations. | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|