Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Множественный кейс-ориентированный семиотический анализ× | Дискурс-анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Качественные методы | Качественные исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1980s–1990s (consolidation in communication and marketing research) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Автор метода≠ | Synthesised from Peircean/Saussurean semiotics and Yin's multiple case study logic; Floch (1990) is a key applied exemplar | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Floch, J.-M. (1990). Semiotique, marketing et communication: sous les signes, les strategies. Presses Universitaires de France. [English translation: Semiotics, Marketing and Communication, Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.] ISBN: 978-0333776858 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | multi-case semiotic analysis, comparative semiotic case study, cross-case semiotic inquiry, MCSA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Сводка≠ | Multiple case-based semiotic analysis is a qualitative research design that applies semiotic frameworks — the systematic study of signs, codes, and meaning-making — across two or more purposively selected cases. By combining the comparative logic of multiple case study research with the interpretive tools of semiotics (structural, Peircean, or Greimasian), it enables researchers to uncover how meaning is constructed and varied across distinct cultural, organisational, or communicative contexts. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|