Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Множественная институциональная этнография на основе конкретных случаев× | Сравнительная этнография× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); multi-case application developed through 1990s–2000s | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Автор метода≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); multi-site adaptation by IE practitioners | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative multi-site research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105690 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | multi-site institutional ethnography, comparative institutional ethnography, multi-case IE, multiple-site IE | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Multiple case-based institutional ethnography combines Dorothy E. Smith's institutional ethnography with a multi-site case structure, enabling researchers to trace how the same ruling relations, texts, and institutional processes operate across two or more distinct organizational or community settings. By holding the analytical framework constant while varying the site, this design reveals both the trans-local reach of ruling apparatus and the locally specific ways people navigate institutional coordination. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|