Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Множественный дискурс-анализ на основе кейсов× | Критический дискурс-анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2000s (integration formalized in qualitative methodology literature) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| Автор метода≠ | Synthesized from Yin's multiple case study design and discourse analysis traditions (van Dijk, Fairclough) | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| Тип≠ | Comparative qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| Другие названия | multi-case discourse analysis, comparative discourse analysis, cross-case discourse analysis, MCDA | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Multiple case-based discourse analysis is a qualitative research design that applies systematic discourse analysis within each of two or more purposively selected cases, then compares the discursive patterns, themes, and power relations across those cases. It combines the replication logic of Yin's multiple case study methodology with the text- and talk-centred analytical tools of discourse analysis traditions such as critical discourse analysis or conversation analysis, enabling researchers to build comparative, theoretically grounded accounts of how language constructs social reality across different contexts. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|