Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Многоисточниковое ненаблюдательное исследование× | Сбор документов× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Методология опросов | Методология опросов |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1970s–1980s (methodological triangulation literature) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| Автор метода≠ | Rooted in systematic observation traditions; multi-source triangulation formalised by Norman Denzin | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative/naturalistic data collection strategy | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | multi-site non-participant observation, multi-context unobtrusive observation, non-reactive multi-source observation, triangulated non-participant observation | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Multi-source non-participant observation is a qualitative data collection strategy in which a researcher systematically observes naturally occurring behaviour across two or more distinct settings, sites, or data sources without joining or influencing the activity being studied. By deliberately excluding the researcher from participation and drawing on multiple independent observational vantage points, the approach strengthens credibility through methodological triangulation while preserving the unobtrusiveness that protects naturalistic behaviour. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|