ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Многоисточниковое глубинное интервью×Многоисточниковая фокус-группа×
ОбластьМетодология опросовМетодология опросов
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature)1980s–1990s
Автор методаGrounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and othersDeveloped from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues)
ТипQualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection technique
Основополагающий источникPatton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Другие названияmulti-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interviewmulti-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFG
Связанные54
СводкаThe multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study.The multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Multi-source In-depth Interview · Multi-source Focus Group. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare