ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Исследование точности диагностики с подбором пар×Поперечное эпидемиологическое исследование×
ОбластьЭпидемиологияЭпидемиология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Автор методаEvolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
ТипDiagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Основополагающий источникBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Другие названияmatched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Связанные46
СводкаA matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare