ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Библиометрические законы: законы Лотки, Брэдфорда и Ципфа×Коцитатный анализ×
ОбластьБиблиометрияБиблиометрия
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1926–19491973
Автор методаAlfred J. Lotka, Samuel C. Bradford, George K. ZipfHenry Small
ТипConceptMethod
Основополагающий источникLotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
Другие названияbibliometric distributions, productivity laws, frequency laws, information science lawsco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
Связанные35
СводкаThree foundational empirical laws describe the structure and distribution of scientific information: Lotka's Law characterizes author productivity (most authors publish few papers; a few publish many), Bradford's Law describes journal concentration (a small number of core journals contain the majority of papers on a topic), and Zipf's Law models word and term frequency (word frequency inversely proportional to its rank). These regularities, discovered in the mid-20th century, are remarkably robust across disciplines and have become essential tools for understanding research productivity, organizing information resources, and designing search strategies.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Bibliometric Laws: Lotka, Bradford, Zipf · Co-Citation Analysis. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare