Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Продольный рефлексивный тематический анализ× | Рефлексивный тематический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2006 (RTA seminal); longitudinal application developed through 2010s | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 |
| Автор метода≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); longitudinal design adapted from qualitative longitudinal research traditions (Saldaña, 2003) | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative analytic method applied longitudinally | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | longitudinal RTA, repeated-wave thematic analysis, longitudinal qualitative thematic analysis, L-RTA | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Longitudinal Reflexive Thematic Analysis (L-RTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to qualitative data collected from the same participants (or context) at two or more time points. Rather than producing a single static account, it tracks how meanings, experiences, and themes evolve, persist, or transform over time, foregrounding the researcher's active reflexive engagement at every stage of the iterative process. | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|