Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Лонгитюдная институциональная этнография× | Партисипативная институциональная этнография× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); longitudinal applications from 1990s onward | 1990s–2000s |
| Автор метода≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); longitudinal extension by subsequent IE practitioners | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research design |
| Основополагающий источник | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759106598 | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 |
| Другие названия≠ | longitudinal IE, time-extended institutional ethnography, longitudinal IE study, IE longitudinal design | participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Longitudinal Institutional Ethnography (longitudinal IE) combines Dorothy Smith's sociology of standpoint — institutional ethnography — with repeated data collection over time to trace how institutional texts, relations, and ruling practices shape people's everyday lives across a temporal span. By revisiting the same participants, settings, or documents at multiple time points, it reveals how institutional coordination evolves, accumulates, or intensifies over weeks, months, or years. | Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|