Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Продольный сравнительно-правовой анализ× | Герменевтический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Полевые методы | Полевые методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | Late 20th century (comparative law foundational texts 1960s–1998; longitudinal integration from 1990s onward) | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Автор метода≠ | Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kotz (comparative law foundation); longitudinal dimension integrated in socio-legal and legal history scholarship | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative-interpretive legal research design | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Zweigert, K., & Kotz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598 | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Другие названия | LCLA, diachronic comparative law, longitudinal legal comparison, dynamic comparative legal research | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Longitudinal comparative legal analysis examines how legal rules, doctrines, or institutions develop and diverge across two or more legal systems over an extended period. By combining the spatial dimension of comparative law with the temporal dimension of longitudinal research, it captures not just differences between jurisdictions at a single point but the trajectories of legal change — convergence, divergence, transplantation, and resistance — over years or decades. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|