Сравнение методов

	Logical Framework Approach	Results-Based Management
Область	Development Studies	Development Studies
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1969	2002
Автор метода	Leon Rosenberg / Practical Concepts Inc. for USAID; later NORAD, GTZ, European Commission	OECD-DAC; United Nations Development Group; aid-effectiveness agenda (Paris Declaration / Accra)
Тип	Project planning, monitoring and evaluation framework	Management and evaluation strategy for development results
Основополагающий источник	NORAD (1999). The Logical Framework Approach (LFA): Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning (4th ed.). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, Oslo.	OECD-DAC (2002). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. OECD Development Assistance Committee, Paris.
Другие названия	Logframe, LFA, Logical Framework Matrix, Objectives-Oriented Planning	RBM, Managing for Development Results, Managing for Results, Results Framework Approach
Связанные	4	4
Сводка	The Logical Framework Approach (Logframe) is a structured planning, monitoring, and evaluation method that distils an intervention into a single four-by-four matrix linking a hierarchy of objectives to the indicators, evidence, and external conditions on which success depends. Originated by Leon Rosenberg of Practical Concepts Incorporated for USAID in 1969 and elaborated by agencies such as GTZ, NORAD, and the European Commission, it forces planners to make explicit the causal logic by which activities are expected to produce outputs, outcomes, and ultimately a development goal.	Results-Based Management (RBM) is a management strategy that orients all the activities, resources, and processes of an organisation or programme toward achieving and demonstrating clearly defined results, rather than merely tracking inputs delivered and activities completed. Codified in the OECD-DAC's 2002 evaluation glossary and adopted across the United Nations, the World Bank, and bilateral agencies, it embeds a results chain, performance indicators, and continuous monitoring into the full project cycle so that evidence on outcomes feeds back into decisions.