ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Intersectionality Analysis×Grounded Theory×
ОбластьGender StudiesКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19891967
Автор методаKimberlé CrenshawBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
ТипCritical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
Основополагающий источникCrenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Другие названияIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Связанные43
СводкаIntersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Intersectionality Analysis · Grounded Theory. Получено 2026-06-24 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare