Сравнение методов

	Интерпретативный дискурс-анализ	Интерпретативный тематический анализ
Область	Качественные методы	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1980s–1990s	2006 (systematic formulation); interpretivist application developed through 2010s
Автор метода	Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (systematic method); interpretivist orientation traced to constructivist qualitative traditions
Тип	Qualitative interpretive research approach	Qualitative data analysis method
Основополагающий источник	Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Другие названия	IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis	ITA, interpretive TA, interpretivist thematic analysis, constructivist thematic analysis
Связанные	6	6
Сводка	Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds.	Interpretive thematic analysis is a form of thematic analysis conducted from an interpretivist or constructivist epistemological standpoint. Rather than treating themes as residing in the data waiting to be discovered, the researcher actively constructs meaning through their engagement with the data. Built on Braun and Clarke's systematic framework, the interpretive variant foregrounds the researcher's theoretical lens and reflexivity, producing analysis that goes beyond description to explain how social, cultural, or contextual forces shape participants' accounts.