Сравнение методов

	Критический дискурс-анализ интерпретативный	Критический дискурс-анализ
Область	Качественные методы	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1990s–2000s	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
Автор метода	Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
Тип	Qualitative discourse analysis design	Qualitative research method
Основополагающий источник	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
Другие названия	interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
Связанные	6	6
Сводка	Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.