Сравнение методов

	Интерпретативный анализ разговора	Интерпретативный дискурс-анализ
Область	Качественные методы	Качественные методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000s	1980s–1990s
Автор метода	Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret Wetherell	Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others
Тип	Qualitative discourse research design	Qualitative interpretive research approach
Основополагающий источник	ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271	Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343
Другие названия	ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysis	IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis
Связанные	6	6
Сводка	Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings.	Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds.