ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Исследование с проверкой гипотез×Исследование тестирования моделей×
ОбластьДизайн исследованияДизайн исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появленияEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)1970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s
Автор методаKarl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon PearsonKarl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition
ТипQuantitative confirmatory research designConfirmatory quantitative research design
Основополагающий источникKerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344
Другие названияhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST designmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR
Связанные45
СводкаHypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Hypothesis Testing Research · Model Testing Research. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare