ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Кросс-культурный анализ HRAF×Количество идентифицированных экземпляров×
ОбластьАрхеологияАрхеология
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19671971
Автор методаGeorge MurdockR. E. Chaplin
ТипEthnographic comparisonFaunal quantification method
Основополагающий источникMurdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗
Другие названияcross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnographyNISP method, specimen count
Связанные24
СводкаHRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: HRAF Cross-Cultural Analysis · Number of Identified Specimens. Получено 2026-06-20 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare