Сравнение методов

	Heterogeneous treatment effect Counterfactual impact evaluation	Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности
Область	Причинно-следственный вывод	Статистика исследований
Семейство	Regression model	Process / pipeline
Год появления	2010s	1983
Автор метода	Cerulli (2010) for CIE framework; Athey & Wager (2019) for causal forest-based CATE within CIE	Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
Тип	Quasi-experimental causal inference with subgroup heterogeneity	Method
Основополагающий источник	Cerulli, G. (2010). Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record, 86(274), 421-449.	Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
Другие названия	HTE-CIE, heterogeneous CIE, CATE-based counterfactual evaluation, subgroup counterfactual impact evaluation	PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Связанные	4	3
Сводка	Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (HTE-CIE) extends standard counterfactual impact evaluation by estimating how the causal effect of a policy or intervention varies across subgroups defined by pre-treatment characteristics. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it maps the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) across the covariate space, revealing who benefits most or least from an intervention.	Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.