Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Оценка непрерывности деятельности× | Модель аудиторского риска× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Бухгалтерский учёт | Бухгалтерский учёт |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 1988 | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) |
| Тип≠ | Audit assessment and reporting framework | Professional auditing framework |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity Evaluation | Risk-Based Audit Planning Model |
| Связанные≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure. | The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|