Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ частоты текста× | Лексическое разнообразие× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Интеллектуальный анализ текста | Интеллектуальный анализ текста |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1949 | — |
| Автор метода≠ | George K. Zipf (frequency-distribution foundation) | — |
| Тип≠ | Descriptive text-mining analysis | Text quantification / lexical richness measurement |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | word frequency analysis, n-gram frequency analysis, Metin Frekans Analizi | lexical richness, vocabulary richness, Sözcüksel Çeşitlilik Analizi |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Text frequency analysis is a descriptive text-mining method that counts how often words, n-grams, and phrases occur in a corpus to reveal content patterns and dominant themes. It rests on the frequency-distribution insight formalised by George K. Zipf (1949), that a few terms occur very often while most are rare, and it is one of the most basic and widely used entry points into quantitative text analysis. | Lexical diversity analysis quantifies how varied the vocabulary of a text is — how rich an author's word choice is — using measures such as the type-token ratio (TTR), MTLD, vocd-D, and Yule's K. The MTLD and vocd-D measures were validated by McCarthy and Jarvis (2010), building on earlier work by Tweedie and Baayen (1998) on the stability of lexical-richness measures. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|