Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Оценка рисков мошенничества× | Модель аудиторского риска× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Бухгалтерский учёт | Бухгалтерский учёт |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 2002 | 1983 |
| Автор метода | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) |
| Тип≠ | Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure framework | Professional auditing framework |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud Assessment | Risk-Based Audit Planning Model |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures. | The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|