Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ дискурса на основе поля× | Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Качественные методы | Качественные исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1980s–1990s | 1967 |
| Автор метода≠ | Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John Frow | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative analytical framework | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|