Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Feminist Discourse Analysis× | Тематический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Gender Studies | Качественные исследования |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2005 | 2006 |
| Автор метода≠ | Michelle M. Lazar | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Тип≠ | Critical feminist discourse-analytic method | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. DOI ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, FCDA, Feminist CDA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis (FCDA) extends critical discourse analysis with an explicit feminist politics, examining how gender ideology and asymmetric power relations between women and men are produced, sustained, contested, and above all naturalized in texts and talk. Articulated by Michelle Lazar in her 2005 edited collection and 2007 programmatic article, it combines the close linguistic analysis of the CDA tradition with feminist theory to expose the often subtle, taken-for-granted sexism through which patriarchal arrangements come to seem ordinary and commonsensical. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|