Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Интервью с экспертами× | Метод Дельфи× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1970s–1990s (methodologically systematized) | 1963 |
| Автор метода≠ | Meuser & Nagel (methodological codification, 1991); roots in elite interview tradition (Dexter, 1970) | Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation) |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research method | Structured iterative expert-elicitation process |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing Experts. Palgrave Macmillan. link ↗ | Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | elite interview, key informant interview, specialist interview | Delphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus method |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | The expert interview is a qualitative method in which researchers conduct in-depth, semi-structured conversations with individuals who hold specialised knowledge, experience, or decision-making authority in a defined field. Unlike general population interviews that target subjective lived experience, expert interviews treat respondents as proxies for a broader institutional or professional knowledge domain. The method is widely used in policy research, organisational studies, science and technology studies, and applied social sciences to map tacit professional knowledge, reconstruct decision processes, and triangulate documentary sources. | The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|