Сравнение методов

	Прагматичные смешанные методы, ориентированные на оценку	Оценка программы
Область	Дизайн исследования	Полевые методы
Семейство	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Год появления	1990s–2000s	1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Автор метода	Jennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie	Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
Тип	Mixed methods research design	Applied evaluation methodology
Основополагающий источник	Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090	Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Другие названия	pragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluation	evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Связанные	2	3
Сводка	Evaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts.	Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.