ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Динамическое взвешивание по обратной вероятности×Взвешивание на основе оценки склонности (PSW / IPW)×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления1986-20001983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Автор методаJames M. Robins and colleaguesRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ТипCausal weighting estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Основополагающий источникRobins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Другие названияDynamic IPW, Time-varying IPW, Longitudinal IPW, Sequential IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Связанные46
СводкаDynamic Inverse Probability Weighting (Dynamic IPW) estimates the causal effect of a time-varying treatment sequence by reweighting observed data to mimic a hypothetical randomised trial. Developed by Robins and colleagues in the context of marginal structural models, it handles the challenge that in longitudinal settings, past treatment affects future covariates, which in turn affect future treatment — a feedback loop that standard regression cannot untangle.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Dynamic Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare