ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Полевой эксперимент с двойным ослеплением×Односторонний полевой эксперимент×
ОбластьПланирование экспериментаПланирование эксперимента
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1960s onward (field experiment tradition); double-blind controls applied from 1970s in social and policy field trialsMid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s)
Автор методаFisher, R. A. (randomized field trials); double-blind practice traced to 19th-century clinical research, formalized for field settings by Campbell & Stanley (1963)Established practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)
ТипExperimental designControlled field experiment with partial blinding
Основополагающий источникGerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. W. W. Norton. ISBN: 978-0393979954Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560
Другие названияdouble-masked field trial, double-blind naturalistic experiment, blinded field study, DB field experimentsingle-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trial
Связанные56
СводкаA double-blind field experiment combines the high external validity of a real-world field setting with double-blind masking, in which neither the participants nor the personnel delivering the treatment know who has been assigned to the treatment or control condition. This design controls simultaneously for participant expectation effects and for experimenter/enumerator demand effects, making it one of the most rigorous tools available for causal inference outside the laboratory.A single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Double-blind field experiment · Single-blind field experiment. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare