ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Сбор документов×Контент-анализ×Дискурс-анализ×Тематический анализ×
ОбластьМетодология опросовКачественные методыКачественные исследованияКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000sSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)2006
Автор методаRooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn BowenKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret WetherellVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
ТипQualitative / mixed data-collection techniqueQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueMethodMethod
Основополагающий источникBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Другие названияdocument analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysisİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
Связанные3523
СводкаDocument collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Document Collection · Content Analysis · Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare