Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Доктринальное правовое исследование× | Герменевтический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Полевые методы | Полевые методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 19th century (systematised ~1860s–1880s in common law jurisdictions) | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Автор метода≠ | Common law tradition; systematised by jurists such as A.V. Dicey and John Austin | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Тип≠ | Legal-analytical research method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Hutchinson, T. (2013). Researching and Writing in Law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters. ISBN: 9780455229829 | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Другие названия | black-letter law research, legal doctrine analysis, analytical jurisprudence, traditional legal scholarship | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Doctrinal legal research is the foundational methodology of legal scholarship. It systematically identifies, reads, and analyses authoritative legal sources — statutes, case law, constitutional texts, and regulations — to describe, explain, and critique the content and internal logic of legal doctrine. By working within the accepted hierarchy of legal sources, it answers the question 'What is the law?' with analytical rigour and interpretive precision, producing descriptions of settled doctrine and arguments for how ambiguities should be resolved. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|