ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Дискриминантная валидность×Конструктная валидность×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления19591955
Автор методаDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
ТипValidity evidence / psychometric evaluationValidity evaluation framework
Основополагающий источникCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Другие названияdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Связанные56
СводкаDiscriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Discriminant Validity · Construct Validity. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare