ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Digital Methods×Controversy Mapping×
ОбластьScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления20132010
Автор методаRichard Rogers, Amsterdam Digital Methods InitiativeBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
ТипEmpirical research approach for online dataQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
Основополагающий источникRogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018838Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
Другие названияFollow the medium, Natively digital research, Web epistemology methodsCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Связанные44
СводкаDigital methods is an empirical research approach, developed by Richard Rogers and the Amsterdam Digital Methods Initiative, that takes the methods of online platforms and devices—the link, the like, the hashtag, the search engine ranking—and repurposes them for social and cultural research. Its guiding maxim is to 'follow the medium': rather than importing offline methods like the survey onto the web, the analyst learns what the medium already counts, ranks, and recommends, and turns those native operations into research instruments.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Digital Methods · Controversy Mapping. Получено 2026-06-24 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare