Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Цифровые историко-архивные исследования× | Метод устной истории× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Полевые методы | Полевые методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2000s (as digital archives became widely accessible) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Автор метода≠ | Emerging practice across digital humanities scholars; Roy Rosenzweig among early proponents | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative historical research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Theimer, K. (2012). What is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? American Archivist, 75(1), 58–68. DOI ↗ | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Другие названия | digital archival research, digital archive history, online archival research, digital humanities archival method | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Digital historical archival research is the systematic investigation of the past using digitized primary sources held in online repositories, digital archives, and electronic databases. It combines the interpretive principles of traditional historical archival research with digital tools for search, retrieval, text mining, and visualization, enabling researchers to access geographically dispersed collections, apply computational analysis to large corpora, and reconstruct historical events, processes, and social phenomena from preserved primary evidence. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|